NOW IS THE TIME FOR CHANGE - Under the present system where the Head of State is a royal, and there is no written constitution, politicians like David Cameron and Boris Johnson can lie with impunity - even to the Queen - and not face penalties. Police officers can shoot unarmed civilians and not be sent to prison, and planning officers can deceive the Secretaries of State and High Court judges, and not be prosecuted. In effect, there is little justice in England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. We aver that such machinations are costing the taxpayer, Treasury and the Crown (being the state) significant sums of money, while adding to the UK's carbon footprint. Hence, the country is not being run effectively by a defective administration.

The UK has no Written Constitution. But it should have. There was a Bill of Rights in 1689, but that has become repeatedly neutralized by the Crown, in a concerted effort to undermine the guarantees supposedly granted to the common man, to protect subjects (citizens) from cruelty and forfeiture. Much the same as there are now manifold abuses rained down on the Human Rights Act 1998.

The present system denies citizens impartial and effective access to the law, without a right of appeal against injustices.

The present system provides the Crown with a mechanism for the state to rid themselves of challenge to corruption, via their police forces and corrupted courts, to obtain SLAPP orders designed to quash legitimate claims to corruption and notification of inconvenient crimes - most notably planning decisions, banking fraud and unlawful conviction and punishments.

The present system is archaic and in urgent need of modernisation if it is to prevent the defects from being taken up by the International Criminal Court. Where the monarchy appears to have lost the ability to secure discrimination free operation of the multiple agencies it employs to ensure a fair and accountable - and most importantly, impartial and independent judicial system. Free of inducements from the Crown.

Crimes committed by a nation against it's own citizens are dealt with by the International Criminal Court, as per the Rome Statute. This is where the State concerned refuses to accept they are acting illegally. Nobody is above the law, including royalty by birth.

PROPOSED ENACTMENT OF A WRITTEN CONSTITUTION GUARANTEEING THE RIGHTS OF THE ORDINARY CITIZEN FROM FREEDOM OF STATE PERSECUTIONS

...

ENCOMPASSING THE FOLLOWING ARTICLES:

1. A

2.  B

3.  C

4.  D

5.  E

6.  F

7.  G

8.  H

9.  I

10. J


...

WHY WE NEED TO UPDATE THE LAW URGENTLY

The Rome Statute is legislation that governs the International Criminal Court (ICC), established to end impunity of the most serious crimes of concern to the international community such as: war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity and crimes of aggression.

To this we would suggest that crimes against humanity should include institutionalised discrimination designed to deprive victims of their rights, to the advantage of competing interests. Such as enjoyment of land and freedom from persecution for challenging corruption. We would see such usurpations as violations of the right to found a family as a watered down eugenics agenda. This includes denial of access to the law and an effective remedy.

The United Kingdom has deliberately omitted Articles 1 and 13 from domestic human rights legislation; the right to an effective remedy. The leftover from Empire days is that the Crown still believe they are a law unto themselves. The UK has made savage cut to Legal Aid with the deliberate intention that those accused of crimes will not be able to mount a fair defence under Article 6, where there are serious restrictions on the level of funding, designed to disadvantage a defendant such that there is not a level playing field. The intention being to improve conviction rates, even though such conviction may be unjust.

Then in furtherance of covering up unjust convictions, the right of appeal, has been delimited, by taking away that right using a Single Judge as a filtration system, whose function is to prevent cases that have obvious merit from getting back to a Court of Appeal, or the High Court for review.

10 DECEMBER 2021 - CHARITY WATCHDOG INVESTIGATION PRINCE CHARLES'S SCOTTISH VILLAGE - A charity watchdog has launched an investigation into financial transactions used to bail out the Prince of Wales’s struggling eco-village in Scotland.

The Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator (OSCR) is already examining fundraising practices at the Prince’s Foundation, following allegations that the Prince of Wales' closest former aide co-ordinated with "fixers" over honours nominations for a Saudi billionaire donor.

Prince Andrew & the Epstein Scandal: The Newsnight Interview - BBC News - 4,840,669 views - 17 Nov 2019 - In a BBC Newsnight special, Emily Maitlis interviews the Duke of York as he speaks for the first time about his relationship with convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein and allegations which have been made against him over his own conduct. For the avoidance of doubt, an allegation of sexual assault does not brand a person a pedophile. A common misconception. In US law, Henry VIII may have been classed as a pedophile, for marrying young women. But laws change. In many European, African and Pacific countries, it is lawful to take a bride of 13. In the UK the age of consent is 16, in the USA it varies from 16 - 18.

LINKS & REFERENCE

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/charity-watchdog-investigating-transactions-used-to-bail-out-prince-charles-s-scottish-eco-village/ar-AARX61G?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/charity-watchdog-investigating-transactions-used-to-bail-out-prince-charles-s-scottish-eco-village/ar-AARX61G?

Please use our A-Z INDEX to navigate this site